|

Supreme Court

• November 8 -- No
More Clarence Thomases!
Some advice for Democrats.
• November 5 -- A
Specter Looming Over Bush's Sunny Week
The Times takes a step back from the election with broad-based,
mostly respectful stories on how values-oriented voters put Bush over the top.
But the paper doesn’t miss a chance to stir controversy, fronting a story on
Republican Sen. Arlen Specter comments on abortion.
• November 4 -- Beware
Bush's Supreme Court Nominees
The Times talks of "strict conservative" nominees to the
Supreme Court.
• October 18 -- Making
Ted Kennedy Look Moderate
Editorial writer Adam Cohen lays out the fearsome fruits of a potential
second term for Bush: "Abortion might be a crime in most states. Gay people
could be thrown in prison for having sex in their homes. States might be free to
become mini-theocracies, endorsing Christianity and using tax money to help
spread the gospel."
• April 13 -- Taking
Another Quack at Scalia
Dredging up Justice Scalia's "Duck-Gate."
• March 25 -- God
-- I Mean Gosh -- I Admire You
Linda Greenhouse admires adamant atheist Michael Newdow's Supreme Court
testimony: "…no one who managed to get a seat in the courtroom is likely
ever to forget his spell-binding performance."
• March 5 -- Justice
Blackmun Grows In Greenhouse
A headline to Linda Greenhouse's story on Supreme Court Justice Harry
Blackmun casts the conservative-turned-liberal justice as having grown in
office: "Released Documents Show The Remarkable Evolution Of a Supreme
Court Justice." Greenhouse insists that by 1970, the liberal order of the
Supreme Court was "vanishing."
• January 14 -- A
"Mean Mood" in US Knocks Down Liberal Legislation
Liberal editorial writer Adam Cohen laments the "mean mood" that's
settled on the country and bashes a Supreme Court that's "made it easier to
discriminate against older workers, blind people and cancer victims."

• November 20 -- Justice
Scalia: "Apocalyptic" but Basically Right
Linda Greenhouse's piece on the Mass.
Supreme Court decision striking down gay marriage bans credits conservative
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia with "apocalyptic statements,"
while calling the Mass. decision "a strikingly inclusive decision that both
apologized for the past and, looking to the future, anchored the gay-rights
claim at issue in the case firmly in the tradition of human rights at the
broadest level."
• October 22 -- Linda
Greenhouse Fights Godless Communism
Linda Greenhouse remembers "…having laboriously learned the Pledge
without 'under God,' all of a sudden, 'under God' came in; it was a federal law.
And I didn't realize at the time that I had become a foot soldier in the war
against Godless communism."
• July 1 -- The “Conservative”
Supreme Court?
Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse marvels on the court’s “amazing
final week.” Even more amazing: Greenhouse still believes the court lacks
liberal voices.
• June 30 -- Bill
Keller Stands Up For Discrimination
Columnist Bill Keller, Howell Raines’ possible successor, sounds downright
Rainesian on race issues. Keller’s Sunday op-ed lauds discrimination and calls
Clarence Thomas “a black jurist of questionable distinction.”
• June 27 -- Angry Conservatives
vs. Happy Gays
The Times goes label-happy on conservatives in its coverage of the Supreme
Court’s sodomy ruling.
• June 24 -- Old
Liberal Labeling Habits Die Hard
Meet Sen. Ted Kennedy, “Democrat of Massachusetts”
Neil Lewis’s Supreme Court story uses the term “conservative” 12 times and
calls Sen. Orrin Hatch a “leading conservative,” while ultra-liberal Sen. Ted
Kennedy is simply a “Democrat of Massachusetts.”
• June 24 --
Embracing “Diversity”
Linda Greenhouse on the Supreme Court’s “forceful endorsement of the role of
racial diversity on campus in achieving a more equal society.”
• June 24 --
Greenhouse’s Gaseous
Grasp on Supreme Court Politics
Before the Supreme Court ruling upholding racial preferences, reporter Linda
Greenhouse wrote an analysis absurdly claiming the Court lacks liberal voices.
• April 25 --
The Times “Core Principles” of Hypocrisy
A Times editorial expresses respect for “core principles of federalism.” But
what happens to their sacred federalism when it comes to liberal laws it likes?
• April 3 --
The Times Parrots
The Military Line--On One Issue
The Times pits the “nuanced” liberal view of racial preferences versus the
“absolutist” conservative one and drops its skepticism toward the
military—because some retired officers are on the Times side.
E-mail
TimesWatch Director, Clay Waters, with TimesWatch feedback at
cwaters@mediaresearch.org
|