|

Michiko Kakutani

• November 5
-- The
Patriot Act Threatens Civil Liberties, Again
Michiko Kakutani reviews a law professor's new book on civil liberties in
wartime and finds ominous modern-day parallels (of course): "At a time when
the Patriot Act threatens to curtail civil liberties…."
• September 30
-- Seymour
Bias in the Book Section
Michiko Kakutani praises left-wing muckraker Seymour Hersh's new book on
Iraq and summarizes the current "conventional wisdom" on the war:
"…a group of conservative, utopian civilians dominated thinking about
Iraq at the Pentagon."
• September 14 -- Room
for Kitty Kelley, None for Swift Boat Vets
After ignoring the book "Unfit for Command" by members of the
Swift Boat Veterans (now #1 on the New York Times best seller list), the Times
greets Bush-hater Kitty Kelley's trashy anti-Bush "biography" with a
front-page Arts section review.
• June 24 -- The
Times Repents for Dissing Clinton's Book
The Times, repenting for a harsh review of Bill Clinton's
autobiography, is rushing a favorable review of the Clinton book onto its
website--though it won't see print for another two weeks.
• June 21 -- Throwing
the Book at Clinton
No one can accuse book reviewer Michiko Kakutani of going soft on Clinton's
new autobiography: "The book, which weighs in at more than 950 pages, is
sloppy, self-indulgent and often eye-crossingly dull--the sound of one man
prattling away, not for the reader, but for himself and some distant recording
angel of history."
• January 14 -- Times
Book Critic Not Mum On Frum
Michiko Kakutani takes on the recent volume by conservative hawks David Frum
and Richard Perle: "It is a screed….all the subtlety of a pit bull on
steroids…smug, shrill and deliberately provocative….macho
posturing…bullying tone and often specious reasoning." She didn't like
Frum's last book much, either.

• September 25 -- The Times vs.
“Scurrilous Biographies”…Sometimes
Michiko Kakutani reviews an anti-Clinton biography and doesn’t like it one
bit: “Nigel Hamilton's new biography of Bill Clinton represents a sleazy new low
in the chronicling of presidential lives. It regurgitates the most scurrilous
and unsubstantiated rumors about Mr. Clinton and his wife…” So the Times would
never herald a book full of “scurrilous and unsubstantiated rumors” about a
president and his wife? Ask Nancy Reagan.
E-mail
TimesWatch Director, Clay Waters, with TimesWatch feedback at
cwaters@mediaresearch.org
|