|

Douglas Jehl
• November 17 -- Is
the New CIA Chief "Suppressing Dissent"?
New C.I.A. chief Porter Goss won't be catching any breaks at the Times,
judging by the coverage so far: "The newest spymaster lays down the law.
Some see his move as suppressing dissent."
• October 7
-- "Prewar
Assertions…Bore No Resemblance to the Truth."
Toning down Douglas Jehl's story on Iraq before it hit print?
• August 25 -- Rummy
Trouble on "Eve" of Republican Convention?
Douglas Jehl's front-page story strains to make the just-released Abu Ghraib
report a political problem for Bush and Donald Rumsfeld on the "eve of the
convention" (still five days away).
• August 4 -- Bush
Playing Politics With Terror?, Part I
A lead editorial obnoxiously suggests Bush is playing political games with
terror warnings: "….it's unfortunate that it is necessary to fight
suspicions of political timing, suspicions the administration has sown by
misleading the public on security." But a front-page report today, armed
with more facts, takes a more sober view of the terror threat.
• July 26 -- Downplaying
Al Qaeda-Iraq Ties, Again
In a front-page story on the 9/11 Commission's final report, Times
reporters again try to minimize proven ties between Al Qaeda and Iraq.
• July 23 -- Times
Again Tries to Minimize Iraq-Al Qaeda Ties
Douglas Jehl insists the final 9/11 report "finds no indication that
contacts between Iraq and Al Qaeda in the 1990's 'ever developed into a
collaborative operational relationship,' a conclusion very different in tone
from assertions by Vice President Dick Cheney and other Bush administration
officials." But the report actually goes into significant detail about
Iraq-Al Qaeda ties.
• July 23 -- Sandy
Berger "Disrupted" Millennium Terror Plot?
After a string of blame-Bush stories in the Times, reporters David
Johnston and Douglas Jehl squelch most of the anti-Bush bias in their story on
the 9/11 commission's final report. But some misinformation still leaks through.
• July 19 -- Failing
to Own Up to Joe Wilson's Credibility Collapse
When will the NYT admit its favorite anti-war horse has come up lame?
• June 22 -- Could
Bush & Co. Have "Foreseen" 9-11?
Douglas Jehl again argues the Bush administration missed clues to the WTC
attack.
• June 18 -- Jehl
Calls Bush Into Question Over 9-11
Douglas Jehl pens a slanted analysis of Bush and the 9-11 report:
"…that panel has called into question nearly every aspect of the
administration's response to terror, including the idea that Iraq and Al Qaeda
were somehow the same foe. Far from a bolt from the blue, the commission has
demonstrated over the last 19 months that the Sept. 11 attacks were foreseen, at
least in general terms, and might well have been prevented, had it not been for
misjudgments, mistakes and glitches, some within the White House."
• June 14 -- A
Late Attack on the War in Iraq
A front-page story by Douglas Jehl and Eric Schmitt, "Errors Are Seen
In Early Attacks On Iraqi Leaders," comes courtesy of the left-wing
anti-war group Human Rights Watch--and unaccompanied by military knowledge,
according to critics.
• April 14 -- Why
Won't Bush Apologize for 9/11?
At Bush's press conference Elisabeth Bumiller demanded: "Do you feel
any sense of personal responsibility for September 11th?"
• April 12 -- Where
"PDB" Means "Pin Damage on Bush"
The Times uses the August 2001 "President's Daily Briefing"
to hit Bush for allegedly missing clues to 9-11--despite the memo's lack of
detail.
• April 5 -- The
Times Still an Anti-Condi Conduit
Douglas Jehl and David Sanger again hold Condoleezza Rice up to a level of
scrutiny that anti-Bush Richard Clarke managed to avoid: "Her task seemed
to become even more difficult on Sunday, when the leaders of the commission said
that it was likely to conclude that the Sept. 11 attacks were preventable."
But the commissioners didn't blame Bush or Rice.
• March 10 -- Twisted
Terror Priorities at the Times
The Times' twisted priorities on the war on terror: Possible
miscalculations by the Bush administration get top-shelf treatment, while
potential terrorist threats are either played down or (in the case of Jehl's
story) not mentioned at all.
• January 22 -- Douglas
Jehl's Dubious CIA Sources
Douglas Jehl pumps up the import of a group of
retired CIA agents pressing Congress for an inquiry into Valerie Plame, but
leaves out the left-wing anti-war connections of some members.
• December 12 -- Halliburton's
Front-Page Non-Scandal
Douglas Jehl's front-page story begins out of
breath: "A Pentagon investigation has found evidence that a subsidiary of
the politically connected Halliburton Company overcharged the government by as
much as $61 million for fuel delivered to Iraq under huge no-bid reconstruction
contracts." Not until the ninth paragraph do we get this line, which
deflates the story's allegedly scandalous import: "The officials said
Halliburton did not appear to have profited from overcharging for fuel."
• November 20 -- The
Times Finally Checks Out Pentagon Memo
After several days, the Times finally weighs in on a
story regarding the leaked memo alleging ties between Saddam Hussein and
al-Qaeda.
• November 14 -- Jehl
Again Buries Details of Demo Memo
Douglas Jehl again discusses the partisan conflict
on the Senate Intelligence panel while leaving out how the panel came to be
feuding in the first place--a Democratic memo that shows the Democrats plotting
to use the Senate hearings for political gain.
• November 6 -- Jehl
Buries Dirty Details of Demo Memo
Douglas Jehl buries the contents of a Democratic
intelligence committee memo which suggested using the supposedly bipartisan
committee for political advantage during Bush's re-election campaign--and
ignores a Democratic senator's fiery criticism of the tactic.
• August 8 -- Times Hacks Bob Novak
Facts
Douglas Jehl sympathizes with the trials of Joseph Wilson, the instigator of the
Bush-uranium-Niger controversy, and accuses columnist Robert Novak of outing his
wife as a “covert C.I.A. operative.” Well, Novak didn’t, but Jehl apparently
just did.
E-mail
TimesWatch Director, Clay Waters, with TimesWatch feedback at
cwaters@mediaresearch.org
|