|

Drugs

• August 11 -- Halbfinger
Omits the Union Label
Reporting on campaign courting of the elderly, David Halbfinger spreads
around more Kerry optimism and leaves out the AFL-CIO origins of a
"three-year-old political organization that claims three million
members" that's endorsing Kerry.
• January 6 -- The "Conservative" Medicare Drug Bill?
Robert Pear surveys the political landscape around the Medicare drug bill and sees no liberals: "The law was written mainly by conservatives and centrists."

• December 8 -- Gingrich as Anti-Medicare Grinch
Deborah Solomon grills the chief executive of AARP for consorting with conservative Newt Gingrich, who Solomon claims "wants to destroy Medicare."
• November 20 -- Still No Liberals in the Medicare Drug Debate
How does one quote Rep. Charles Rangel and Sen. Ted Kennedy in a Medicare story without using the word "liberal?" Ask Robert Pear and Robin Toner.
• October 29 -- Times
Bias Toward Bad Medicine?
Does the Times have a bad news bias when it comes to prescription drug
coverage? Gardiner Harris' story in August concerning possible safety problems
with anti-depressant drugs made the Times front page. But his latest story,
which somewhat contradicts that premise, is buried on the last page of section
F.
• October 21 -- Bush
Jr. -- No Senior Appeal?
Robin Toner squeezes data out of an old poll to show "Bush's Popularity With Older Voters Is Seen As Slipping"--and lets us know who the bad guys are in the Medicare debate.
• September 18 --
Robert Pear Overdoses On
“Conservatives”
Robert Pear’s story on drug subsidies for seniors overdoses on the
“conservative” label, employing the term seven times in a 750-word story.
Meanwhile, ultraliberal Sen. Ted Kennedy is again merely a “Democrat of
Massachusetts.”
• July 21 -- Still No Liberal
Labeling In Drug Coverage
A front-page story by Robert Pear on the tough road ahead for a Medicare
drug bill calls the liberal group Families USA, which favors Canadian-style
socialized medicine, a “consumer group.” Meanwhile, on the other side,
“Conservatives agree that the Senate subsidies are generous -- too generous,
they say.”
• July 17 --
Tax Cuts Cause
Deficits, But Medicare Spending Doesn’t?
David Rosenbaum’s front-page story is headlined: “White House Sees A $455
Billion Gap In The ’03 Budget -- Would Be Biggest U.S. Deficit -- Democrats
Point to Tax Cuts.” Why not “Conservatives Point to Medicare Drug Spending?”
• July 15 --
Still Looking for the Liberal Label
Robin Toner and Robert Pear went label-crazy on conservatives in their story
on Medicare coverage of prescription drugs, using the “conservative” label six
times while avoiding “liberal” entirely. This in a story featuring Sen. Ted
Kennedy.
• June 24 --
“Democrat of Massachusetts,” Part 2
Tuesday’s Times reverts to old habits. Robin Toner and Robert Pear’s story
on the Medicare drug bill contains 10 “conservative” versus one “liberal” label,
and again terms ultra-liberal Sen. Ted Kennedy simply as a “Democrat of
Massachusetts.”
• June
3 -- Bad Medicine
At The Times
Times critics are “flooding the zone” regarding the paper’s slanted coverage
of the pharmaceutical industry, with one suggesting an Augusta National-style
crusade in the works against drug companies.
E-mail
TimesWatch Director, Clay Waters, with TimesWatch feedback at
cwaters@mediaresearch.org
|