Has Obama Really Overcome His Wright Problem? NYT Says Sure
But a new USA Today/Gallup poll found the opposite to be true: "One-third of likely voters say Obama's ties to Wright make them less likely to vote for him."

Posted by: Clay Waters
5/6/2008 2:13:17 PM


The latest CBS/New York Times poll indicated good news for Democrats in general and Barack Obama in particular, showing Obama beating John McCain 51%-40% in a hypothetical matchup, and Hillary Clinton beating McCain 53%-41%. Adam Nagourney and Marjorie Connelly wrote it up for their front-page story Monday, pushing the perception that Obama had shook off his Rev. Jeremiah Wright problem. The headline spelled: it out "In Poll, Obama Survives Furor, But Fall Is Test."

 

Strangely, a new USA Today/Gallup poll found nearly the opposite, showing Obama taking a big hit and Hillary leading him by seven points nationwide, 51%-44%. Two weeks ago Obama led the same poll by ten percentage points.

 

Unlike the Times, Gallup found the Rev. Jeremiah Wright to be a continuing thorn in Obama's side. USA Today reporter Susan Page summarized:

 

"One-third of likely voters say Obama's ties to Wright make them less likely to vote for him."

 

Blogger and journalist Mickey Kaus thinks the Times is whistling past the graveyard if it thinks Obama wasn't hurt by Wright, citing a May 2 Monica Davey report in which she found not a single Indianapolis liberal willing to say Jeremiah Wright's rantings changed their views of Obama.

 

After reading Nagourney's poll story favoring Obama, Kaus proclaimed it "now-iffy self-generated news on the front page" and a "bogus cocooning poll exercise." Perhaps we'll all have a better idea who got it right on Tuesday night.





 TimesWatch RSS Feed

NewsBusted Comedy Show
New Episode! - June 17, 2009


Join us on:
Join BMI on Facebook  Follow BMI on Twitter






Elsewhere on the Web

Was the Times wrong to hide reporter David Rohde's kidnapping by the Taliban? Mathew Ingram of the Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard argues yes: See Article

The Times is probably safe from bankruptcy through at least the year 2015, write Nat Ives and Bradley Johnson for Ad Age: See Article

John Koblin of the New York Observer watched three top Times editors, including Executive Editor Bill Keller, trying to humanize themselves in Midtown Manhattan: See Article

A little White House diplomacy was all it took to get Times columnist and left-wing Obama-critic Paul Krugman back on the team. New York magazine writer Hugo Lindgren has the tick-tock: See Article

Archive





NewsBusters Blog

 

Copyright TimesWatch.org 2009