Tough Times at the Times: Staff Space Gets Pinched
That 39% decline in profits last quarter, coming after a string of bad news quarters and disastrous decline in its stock price, has finally started to hit the New York Times where it lives: in its new offices, which are about to become a lot more cramped than planned.

Posted by: Thomas Lifson
10/31/2006 2:43:14 PM


That 39% decline in profits last quarter, coming after a string of bad news quarters and disastrous decline in its stock price, has finally started to hit the New York Times where it lives: in its new offices, which are about to become a lot more cramped than planned.

The Times is building a brand new glamorous high tech skyscraper headquarters in New York’s Midtown. Designed by the au courant architect Renzo Piano, I call it the Pinch Mahal. The company used eminent domain to evict 55 businesses from some of the needed land, bought Port Authority land at a steep discount, and got ample tax breaks.

The plan was for the NYT to occupy the first 29 floors. But today comes news that five of those floors will be taken away and rented out, at an estimated $85 per square foot, which would make it in the top tier of commercial office space rentals in America.

The floors to be rented out, curiously enough, are the 23rd through the 27th floors. This means that floors 28 and 29 will separated from the rest of the operation. Could they possibly be the executive floors? Will Pinch increase the distance between his own digs and those of the plebes? It is, after all, quite common for the bosses to grab the top floors.

It also means that either there will fewer worker bees at the Times, or that there will be a lot more elbows bumping into each other. Or maybe both.

That tightening belt is beginning to Pinch. It would be a great symbolic move if Pinch gave up his private office and moved to a desk in the City Room. But I bet that Pinch won’t get pinched.


 

 



      Eyeblast TV!
 TImesWatch RSS Feed
 
Elsewhere on the Web

The New York Times predicted Fannie Mae failure in 1999 (so why won't the 2008 Times acknowledge it?). Hot Air has the scoop. See Article

During this panicky time on Wall Street, the Times needs to choose its words more carefully, argues National Review's Media Blog. See Article

Highlighting the Times' cheerleading for Barack Obama, National Review's Jonah Goldberg points out that the most telling defense of the paper came from the Obama campaign itself. See Article

Rush Limbaugh says the Times is now printing "Obama propaganda on the front page." See Article

Archive


NewsBusted Comedy Show
New Episode! - September 24, 2008

video archive

NewsBusters Blog

 

 

 

Copyright TimesWatch.org 2008